Kyle Bennison

  • Reviewing My 2024 Goals, Plans for 2025 and This Site

    Reviewing My 2024 Goals, Plans for 2025 and This Site

    In This Post

    2024 Goals

    2025 Goals

    Plans for Staturdays

    I’ve been reading The Power of Habit, by Charles Duhigg, recently. You might know it by its bright yellow cover. I’m about halfway through, but as usual when I get into one of these books (Atomic Habits by James Clear being the other one), it makes me start to think about my own habits and goals for the future.

    For the last few years, I’ve been writing New Year’s resolutions. Most times, I don’t ever revisit them after I write them. They’re usually not too thought out to begin with and are usually generic (such as “exercise more”: a regular on the resolution list).

    However, this year, I decided to actually re-read my 2024 goals first and think about my progress towards them before writing new ones for next year.

    I’ll go through my 2024 goals and my 2025 goals, and wrap it up with my thoughts on how this relates to this website and my goals for this place and its content going forward.

    So here are my 2024 goals and how I rated myself.

    2024 Goals

    Get in shape

    Rating: 3/5 – Room for improvement and measurement.

    Positives

    • I signed up for a gym membership on December 1st, and was consistent in going for the first two weeks while I was in town.
    • I made specific workout routines that I can repeat every time so I don’t have to make it up on the fly – this had been a big challenge and mental block in the past, and made it hard to measure my progress because I was doing something slightly different every time.
    • I run ~ 2 times per week.
    • I play soccer every Wednesday night.

    Areas of improvement

    • I’m inconsistent with my running schedule.
    • I don’t have the diet to go with it. Namely I:
      • Don’t choose enough healthy options
      • Don’t consume enough calories and protein
      • Have reduced my alcohol, but still make many exceptions and probably average out to a drink or two per week

    Be present

    Rating: 1/5

    Positives

    • I am occasionally intentional about putting my phone down when someone is talking to me.

    Areas of Improvement

    • Still fairly glued to my phone
    • Sometimes my head is somewhere else when someone is talking to me, especially while working or driving.
    • Can struggle to destress in a busy/crowded environment (e.g. cooking for others, or hosting… focusing so much on the task or on keeping an eye on the dog that I forget to enjoy myself and listen to others.)

    Foster relationships

    Rating – 2/5

    Positives

    • Deepening new friendships in Baltimore
    • Inviting people to things, accepting invites of others
    • Texting closest long-distance friends monthly/bimonthly

    Areas of Improvement

    • Meaningful check-ins with friends in person
    • Deliberate scheduling of visits or planning for people to come to visit me
    • When something makes me think of someone, I should text them about it. The key is to act on it immediately before it slips my mind. I regularly say “oh, I should do that later” then hours or days go by before I remind myself of it again.

    Be a good listener

    Rating – 1/5 – Similar to Be Present

    Positives

    • Clearly communicating when I’m not listening or need to finish something to be able to listen properly
    • Putting my phone down or turning away from my computer

    Areas of Improvement

    • Still get distracted by my phone, put more importance on some article I’m reading or other nonsense than the people in front of me
    • Still forget little details or things that have been said many times (likely because I’m on my phone/not present)
    • Still think about work in my head while listening/thinking about something else at the same time
    • Ask people more questions about themselves and listen to the answer fully

    Others

    These were also on my 2024 goals list, though I feel I made much less progress or conscious effort towards them than the above categories.

    • mental health
    • reduce screen time
    • get outdoors
    • meditation/mindfulness
    • hobbies
    • community engagement/volunteering
    • de-stressing

    2025 Goals

    In 2025, I’m trying to organize my goals around themes and tangible start and end points (this is easier said than done and very much still a work in progress). Each theme can have one ore more goals attached to it, and each goal can also cover one or more themes, but usually there is a primary theme and secondary theme. The benefit of this is that my goals can help each other and work together, as you’ll see below.

    My themes are:

    • Healthy eating
    • Wise usage of free time
    • Thriftiness
    • Exercise
    • Mental focus and clarity
    • Fulfilling relationships with friends and family
    • Giving more than I get in life, relationships, friendships, and community

    Some of these are lofty, which is why they have more approachable goals underneath them.

    Here are a few of my goals.

    Exercise

    Gain 10 lbs. of muscle

    This one is pretty straightforward and measurable. I’m starting at 145 pounds and hoping to get to 155 pounds by following a consistent and deliberate routine. I’m also hoping that this will be a “keystone habit” for me, as its referred to in The Power of Habit, and spillover into other goals and aspects of my life (mainly Healthy Eating and Mental Focus and Clarity themes).

    Wise usage of free time

    Cut out passive screen time

    I have a lot of screen time. I have 8 hours of work screen time, 3-4 hours of phone screen time (according to Apple), and probably another 1 to 2 or upwards of 3 to 4 hours of TV screen time, depending on the night (some of these hours do overlap, mainly phone + TV time). This is basically every waking hour of my day, unfortunately.

    Aside from the strain on my eyes, my chief concern with this trend is what comes with my screen time: sitting and usually accomplishing nothing. Sitting being terrible for my health, and accomplishing nothing being a poor use of my time.

    Work screen time is mostly inevitable (I can probably take some more calls on my phone on a walk, but not many), so I will focus on cutting down what I call passive screen time: scrolling aimlessly or consuming mindlessly. I already have a few ideas.

    Another of my goals is to host friends more often. To host friends more often, I need to cook, which means I need to plan and try recipes ahead of time. Sunday night seems like a great time to do this. I usually sit on the couch and watch Sunday Night Football, which is great fun but a complete waste of time unless the Eagles are playing, as much as I enjoy Tirico and Collinsworth. So instead, I’ve decided that I can throw the game on in the background but will use that time in the kitchen to plan and try a recipe for the week. So now I’m making progress towards two goals at once.

    Here are my other goals:

    • Be 100% sober
    • Donate unused items to shelters and goodwill
    • Eat enough protein to build muscle
    • Get 8+ hours of sleep per night
    • Improve memory of conversations, plans, and events
    • Read every week
    • Spend less time sitting

    I’m still working on goals for my Give more than I get… theme. If you have any suggestions, I’d love to hear them.

    You’ll also notice I don’t have a writing goal or career goals here yet. Those are also things I’m still thinking about. All I know with my writing is that when I do it, I really enjoy it, and I really like the idea of doing it much more regularly. However, finding the time and the willpower, as well as the content to write about, has been the stumbling block for me.

    Another thing that Duhigg mentions about habit research is the importance of two things: cues and preparing for adversity.

    Cues

    Cues are things that trigger a habit. It’s essential to have these to help kick off an action. If you have a bad habit, you might keep the same cue and replace the bad habit with the new habit. For a net-new habit, you might need a net-new cue too.

    I already mentioned my Sunday Night Football cue. Some others I’m considering are:

    CueAction
    when the Eagles game is about to startgo on a run and listen to the first quarter on the Merrill Reese and Mike Quick radio broadcast (this is a win-win since I love listening to the radio broadcast sometimes).
    7:00 AM on Mondays, Wednesdays, and SaturdaysGo to the gym
    Getting home from the gymMake a protein shake
    Fiancé walks into my officePut my phone down and turn away from my laptop

    Adversity

    Many things will get in the way of my goals throughout the year. These should mostly be predictable, so by making a plan now for what I should do when I face those issues, I will be prepared and the action I take will become as much of a habit as my regular routine would be. Here are a few:

    GoalAdversityPlan
    Be 100% soberAt a bar with no NA optionsOrder a seltzer with lime
    Gain 10 lbs. of muscleTraveling and no weights availableHave an intense bodyweight routine planned and do that instead
    Read every weekBook I want is not available to check outMake a list of many books I want to read ahead of time, and schedule holds now so I can have options.

    Plans for Staturdays

    Now to the specifics for this site. As you probably know, Staturdays started as a college football stats and analytics blog by my brother Drew and I. He was a student studying Data Science and I was an aspiring Data Scientist doing marketing. We did a weekly podcast, I wrote a weekly newsletter, we did bets and Elo ratings and rankings and more. At our peak, we had thousands of visits per month (albeit mostly on the homepage and stats glossary), and a handful of listeners to the podcast. But we were having fun.

    I’m a bit sad that those times are long-gone, but so much has changed.

    Our lives have changed: I’m a full-time data scientist now, and doing stats as both my day job and as a hobby just doesn’t hit like it used to. Drew is a full-time analyst doing data science as well. We both have long-term partners and dogs.

    College football has changed. The portal changed everything with college football. A team can get really good or really bad overnight because roster turnover is so high. An entire squad of players can follow a coach somewhere else and turn a bad program into a great one. A few guys can leave and cripple a great program quickly. I’m not saying we can’t keep up if we tried, but I don’t know if I want to. I’ve lost a lot of love for the sport as a whole. I still love my team and love watching, but it’s so different, and I’m curious to hear if others feel that way too.

    Sports betting has changed. When we started, sports betting was just becoming legal in some states and was still getting off the ground. It was just something kind of fun to do. However, the incessant advertising for sports betting has gotten out of hand, as have the tie-ins with leagues and teams. The risk of match-fixing is real and we’ve already started to see some of it pop up in the US. But most of all, I’m just very concerned with the amount of money regular people are wagering and losing on sports. Regular people that were previously not losing $3,000 a year on sports betting are now doing that… people that I know. I have the self-control and financial discipline to make small bets for fun, but many people do not, and I don’t know if I want to contribute to that by posting my bets and having some readers take them as if they’re sure investments.

    The internet has changed. We used to share our stuff on Twitter.com. There was a big community of CFB stats nerds there, and a lot of casual fans and betting enthusiasts as well who were interested in our work. That has fizzled out, and I’ve stepped back from Twitter since it fundamentally changed as well. The algorithm is different. Bots and paid accounts win out over authentic people and conversations. A lot of people have left. We tried Substack as well, but we don’t own our page and it’s geared towards recurring newsletters which is not exactly what we’re going for. Reddit mods don’t like links to third-party content. To summarize: everything is very scattered and fractured.

    Our interests have changed. As I said, I’ve fallen out of love with college football a bit, and shifted more towards some less popular sports like Formula 1, Indycar, Golf, Tennis, and Soccer. I’m aware that the followers of Staturdays did not sign up to hear about these things, but I may want to write about them in the future. Additionally, I’m not an expert on any of these sports, so starting to write about them has large upfront costs of acquiring knowledge, doing research, and finding and analyzing data if it’s available. I also want to write about things that are not sports-related at all sometimes.

    People have changed. I know my attention span is getting shorter and shorter. The world as we know it is geared toward quick-hit video consumption. Do people still want to sit down and read long-form analysis like this? I don’t know.

    Weighing all this, I’ve decided to carry on with writing when inspiration strikes, and hopefully more regularly if I get into a routine. I’m going to do all of my writing here at staturdays.com, because it’s my site and I own it and its content. I’m not going to split off and maintain multiple places for different subjects or sports. Rather, I’m redesigning the page tree so you can find exactly what you’re interested in, and I can write about exactly what I want at the time without one affecting the other. If you’re just in it for college football, then that category of posts will still be available to you. Whether I add to it or not is yet to be determined.

    I think this is the best of both worlds: I don’t fragment the internet anymore than it already is. There’s one place to find my stuff and it’s right here. You know where to find it. I hope you’ll stop by and join me now and then.

  • Norris Qatar Grand Prix Throttle Trace Analysis

    Norris Qatar Grand Prix Throttle Trace Analysis

    At the Qatar Grand Prix on Sunday, an errant side mirror from the Williams ended up on the front straight, causing some brief yellow flags that Norris did not heed to, resulting in a 10-second stop-and-go penalty and effectively ending his day.

    Let’s take a look at the data and see what actually happened.

    A wing mirror sits in the middle of the straight as Perez and Hamilton drive by.

    First, lets look at the normal braking points for reference. This was the lap before the yellow, lap 29:

    Between 600-650 meters is the normal braking point.

    Now lets look at the next lap, focusing on the top drivers who actually saw the yellow flag—remember, the yellow flag only came out for a moment, and then was removed for several laps until the mirror was run over by Bottas.

    Here we see that the flag actually came out late into the straight for Max, who throttled down almost 200 meters before normal. Norris was further back down the straight and did not lift, and Leclerc (who was behind Piastri, not shown) lifted a quite early, throttled back up, then down again.

    Piastri was right behind Norris and lifted very early, while Sainz was behind Leclerc and throttled down about 100 meters early. And by the time Perez came around, the flags were gone.

    By these traces, it’s clear that Norris was the heaviest infringer here. So I’d say a penalty was warranted. However, a few questions remain.

    First, what’s considered sufficient slowing for a yellow flag? Verstappen lifted completely, while Leclerc lifted slightly and seemed unsure of where to continue on, and Sainz went through the majority of the flag area at full throttle and lifted near the actual debris.

    And second, why was the yellow flag rescinded with no change in the situation? If the mirror was deemed hazardous, then every driver should have been made to lift in that section (or more reasonably, a VSC should have been deployed to keep the field even until the piece was removed).

    This issue was clear as day and folks at home could have reacted in an instant, but it took the race director six laps to decide what to do, and it was only prompted by Bottas hitting the debris and two punctures coming at the same time.

    Just to emphasize the differences, here’s the speed differences of the Top 6 going into turn 1 on Lap 30, and as you can see Norris is just well ahead of the rest of the field (although I should note that the rest of the field, with maybe Max as the exception, were all going almost 300 kph through the majority of the straight until the actual debris point.)

  • How F1 Can Keep Monaco Relevant

    How F1 Can Keep Monaco Relevant

    Monaco has always been the most prestigious event in all of motorsport. It shares a weekend with the Indy 500, known as the Greatest Spectacle in Motorsport, and it makes up one-third of the Triple Crown of Motorsport, which also includes the 24 Hours of Le Mans. This past weekend, however, there was little argument to be had that this event should continue to be mentioned in the same breath as the others.

    While the 500 reaffirmed its claim to its prized title, the Monaco Grand Prix has fallen from grace. Maybe not for the celebrities and honorable guests that attend the party in person, but for the millions around the world who watch on TV—and for the drivers themselves.

    What Happened

    This year, a first-lap red flag threw any element of strategy out the window when most teams decided to change tires under red onto the hard tire and take them to the finish line, fulfilling their two-tire compound requirement. Leclerc led every lap and won handily, and there was never a moment where the result was in any doubt. (To be fair, you could say that about most F1 races for the past two seasons.)

    To add insult to injury, Ferrari and Sainz were handed a gift via an F1 rules technicality. After Sainz picked up a puncture at the exit of turn 1 and then couldn’t get the car turned in at turn 4, the red flag put him back into 3rd again for the restart since the flag came out before all cars made it through sector 1. Despite all common sense indicating that he should be at the back of the field, F1 rules trumped reason as they commonly do.

    After the race, sentiment on social media was poor. However, perhaps more concerning for F1 and Monaco were the references to just how boring the race was by the commentary teams and the drivers themselves.

    When the drivers are struggling to stay entertained when they’re the ones in the freaking race, how can you expect the fans thousands of miles away to be excited or engaged?

    Trending the Wrong Way

    Monaco wasn’t always this boring. In the past decade of races (9 races), 44% of pole-sitters won, there was an average of less than 1 lead change per race, and the average starting position of the winner was 1.8.

    From 1995-2004 (10 races), the pole-sitter won just 20% of races, there were an average of 2.5 lead changes per race, and the average starting position of the eventual winner was 3.2. However, there was a big outlier in 96. Without that, the average starting position was 2, fairly similar to today’s average.

    As you can see, starting position of the winner is heavily influenced by one outlier.

    Common Sense Fixes

    While no changes can guarantee a better race on such a narrow, low-speed circuit, it became clear this year that something has to be done. Doing nothing at this point would be negligent and outright disrespectful to the fans.

    Max Verstappen and George Russell offered their tongue-in-cheek solutions in their post-race interviews, suggesting “5 mandatory pit stops”, “refueling”, “one lap on foot”, and a “mandatory nap”.

    Lewis Hamilton also suggested adding mandatory pitstops.

    I think there are some general rule changes that could benefit every race—not just Monaco—as well as some changes that they could make to the Monaco format itself, such as the addition of mandatory stops or extra-soft compounds with higher degradation.

    Tire changes under red don’t satisfy the two-compound rule

    This one is the most obvious to me, and seems to be a point of agreement among broadcasters and fans alike, but changing your tires under a red flag should not mean that you are allowed to go the whole race without stopping. Maybe they need to rethink the rule entirely and make it a mandatory pitstop rule rather than a mandatory two-compound rule. I believe that would better reflect the spirit of the rule. Or do both: one mandatory stop and two mandatory tire compounds. The more decisions that a team needs to make and the more opportunities for various strategies to take hold, the better for the sport.

    Add more official timing sectors to determine order

    Only the three official sectors, plus the two safety car lines are used for determining order under red-flag conditions.

    While McLaren boss Andreas Siedel admitted after Monaco that he still doesn’t think mini-sectors are the appropriate answer, I think there’s a compromise to be made to get more granular positions updated more frequently throughout the lap, without compromising accuracy—a common counter to using mini-sectors.

    A map of the current Monaco Circuit.

    The main argument against mini-sectors, as explained by this Reddit poster, is that some of them are positioned in such a way that a driver could overshoot or even cut a corner and be “ahead” in a mini-sector, but truly behind if the next mini-sector or two were played out. The user continues, claiming that sectors are chosen in places to prevent that from happening, where cars are typically strung out in single-file.

    However, if you look at the Monaco circuit, sector 1 ends in the run down to turn 5, a braking zone where exactly what regular sectors purport to prevent could indeed happen if someone overran the braking point and hit the runoff area: they would find themselves “ahead” at the end of sector 1 but well behind the pack by the time they got spun around.

    While three sectors is fine for television, the race stewards should have several more sectors at their disposal for timing decisions. Here’s a simple proposal for a modified map at Monaco. You’ll notice that most of the points occur at or near already naturally-occurring spots on the track, such as the tunnel speed trap or DRS detection zone.

    A proposal for additional timing sectors.

    You could easily add more without compromising the integrity of the timing, especially at a street circuit like Monaco where there are very few areas to cut corners (we wouldn’t want a sector to be anywhere near the 10-11 chicane for that reason).

    Use common sense

    This one is vague, but any fan watching the race knew that Sainz deserved to be at the back of the field after that mistake. But the stewards opted to go by the book and reinstate him to 3rd. This is where some steward judgement needs to come in to set things right. Perhaps some lawyer can word this better than me, but if you clearly go off on your own accord and the field passes you by, then you should be at the back of the pack on the restart. Which leads me to my final point.

    Let the TV broadcast aid timing decisions

    I’d argue you should even use the TV broadcast as a point of reference like every other major sport does these days. Sync the video to timing and see how many cars had passed by Sainz at the moment the red flag came back out. Then determine his position based on that info. If for some reason it’s so close that you can’t clearly tell from TV, then leave things as is or resort to sector timings. But if it’s “clear and obvious”, then by all means let’s get it right.